Duplex Ultrasound versus Computed Tomography for the Postoperative Follow-Up of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Where Do We Stand Now?

Abstract

In the last decade, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has rapidly developed to be the preferred method for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with suitable anatomy. EVAR offers the advantage of lower perioperative mortality and morbidity but carries the cost of device-related complications such as endoleak, graft migration, graft thrombosis, and structural graft failure. These complications mandate a lifelong surveillance of EVAR patients and their endografts. The purpose of this study is to review and evaluate the safety of color-duplex ultrasound (CDU) as compared with computed tomography (CT), based on the current literature, for post-EVAR surveillance. The post-EVAR follow-up modalities, CDU versus CT, are evaluated questioning three parameters: (1) accuracy of aneurysm size, (2) detection and classification of endoleaks, and (3) detection of stent-graft deformation. Studies comparing CDU with CT scan for investigation of post-EVAR complications have produced mixed results. Further and long-term research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of CDU versus CT, before CDU can be recommended as the primary imaging modality for EVAR surveillance, in place of CT for stable aneurysms.

Keywords

EVAR surveillance - post-EVAR follow-up - CDU vs CT

• References

• 1 Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, Powell JT, Thompson SG. EVAR trial participants. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 364 (9437) 843-848
• 2 Blankensteijn JD, de Jong SE, Prinssen M , et al; Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management (DREAM) Trial Group. Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2005; 352 (23) 2398-2405
• 3 Prinssen M, Verhoeven EL, Buth J , et al; Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management (DREAM)Trial Group. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2004; 351 (16) 1607-1618
• 4 EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365: 2179-2186
• 5 Wolff KS, Prusa AM, Polterauer P , et al. Endografting increases total volume of AAA repairs but not at the expense of open surgery: experience in more than 1000 patients. J Endovasc Ther 2005; 12 (3) 274-279
• 6 Jordan WD, Alcocer F, Wirthlin DJ, Westfall AO, Whitley D. Abdominal aortic aneurysms in “high-risk” surgical patients: comparison of open and endovascular repair. Ann Surg 2003; 237 (5) 623-629 , discussion 629–630
• 7 Gallagher KA, Ravin RA, Meltzer AJ , et al. Midterm outcomes after treatment of type II endoleaks associated with aneurysm sac expansion. J Endovasc Ther 2012; 19 (2) 182-192
• 8 Mehta M, Sternbach Y, Taggert JB , et al. Long-term outcomes of secondary procedures after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52 (6) 1442-1449
• 9 Schlösser FJ, Gusberg RJ, Dardik A , et al. Aneurysm rupture after EVAR: can the ultimate failure be predicted?. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009; 37 (1) 15-22
• 10 Veith FJ, Martin ML, Guidelines for the development of transluminally placed endovascular graft devices for aortic aneurysm repair. In: Hopkins B, Yusuf W, Whitaker S, Veith F. , eds. Endovascular Surgery for Aortic Aneurysms, London: WB Saunders; 1997: 1-16
• 11 Harris PL, Vallabhaneni SR, Desgranges P, Becquemin JP, van Marrewijk C, Laheij RJ. Incidence and risk factors of late rupture, conversion, and death after endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms: the EUROSTAR experience. European Collaborators on Stent/graft techniques for aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2000; 32 (4) 739-749
• 12 Chaikof EL, Brewster DC, Dalman RL , et al; Society for Vascular Surgery. The care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: the Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines. J Vasc Surg 2009; 50 )4, Suppl) S2-S49
• 13 Patel ST, Haser PB, Bush Jr HL, Kent KC. The cost-effectiveness of endovascular repair versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A decision analysis model. J Vasc Surg 1999; 29 (6) 958-972
• 14 Clair DG, Gray B, O'hara PJ, Ouriel K. An evaluation of the costs to health care institutions of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2000; 32 (1) 148-152
• 15 Sternbergh III WC, Money SR. Hospital cost of endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a multicenter study. J Vasc Surg 2000; 31 (2) 237-244
• 16 Bosch JL, Lester JS, McMahon PM , et al. Hospital costs for elective endovascular and surgical repairs of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Radiology 2001; 220 (2) 492-497
• 17 Bosch JL, Kaufman JA, Beinfeld MT, Adriaensen ME, Brewster DC, Gazelle GS. Abdominal aortic aneurysms: cost-effectiveness of elective endovascular and open surgical repair. Radiology 2002; 225 (2) 337-344
• 18 Noll Jr RE, Tonnessen BH, Mannava K, Money SR, Sternbergh III WC. Long-term postplacement cost after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46 (1) 9-15 , discussion 15
• 19 Prinssen M, Wixon CL, Buskens E, Blankensteijn JD. Surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair: diagnostics, complications, and associated costs. Ann Vasc Surg 2004; 18 (4) 421-427
• 20 European Commission.. Radiation protection 118. Referral guidelines for imaging. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2000
• 21 Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357 (22) 2277-2284
• 22 Walsh SR, Tang TY, Boyle JR. Renal consequences of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther 2008; 15 (1) 73-82
• 23 White HA, Macdonald S. Estimating risk associated with radiation exposure during follow-up after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2010; 51 (1) 95-104
• 24 Parfrey PS, Griffiths SM, Barrett BJ , et al. Contrast material-induced renal failure in patients with diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, or both. A prospective controlled study. N Engl J Med 1989; 320 (3) 143-149
• 25 Beeman BR, Doctor LM, Doerr K, McAfee-Bennett S, Dougherty MJ, Calligaro KD. Duplex ultrasound imaging alone is sufficient for midterm endovascular aneurysm repair surveillance: a cost analysis study and prospective comparison with computed tomography scan. J Vasc Surg 2009; 50 (5) 1019-1024
• 26 Heilberger P, Schunn C, Ritter W, Weber S, Raithel D. Postoperative color flow duplex scanning in aortic endografting. J Endovasc Surg 1997; 4 (3) 262-271
• 27 Sato DT, Goff CD, Gregory RT , et al. Endoleak after aortic stent graft repair: diagnosis by color duplex ultrasound scan versus computed tomography scan. J Vasc Surg 1998; 28 (4) 657-663
• 28 Thompson MM, Boyle JR, Hartshorn T , et al. Comparison of computed tomography and duplex imaging in assessing aortic morphology following endovascular aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 1998; 85 (3) 346-350
• 29 Zannetti S, De Rango P, Parente B , et al. Role of duplex scan in endoleak detection after endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000; 19 (5) 531-535
• 30 Wolf YG, Johnson BL, Hill BB, Rubin GD, Fogarty TJ, Zarins CK. Duplex ultrasound scanning versus computed tomographic angiography for postoperative evaluation of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2000; 32 (6) 1142-1148
• 31 Fletcher J, Saker K, Batiste P, Dyer S. Colour Doppler diagnosis of perigraft flow following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Int Angiol 2000; 19 (4) 326-330
• 32 d'Audiffret A, Desgranges P, Kobeiter DH, Becquemin JP. Follow-up evaluation of endoluminally treated abdominal aortic aneurysms with duplex ultrasonography: validation with computed tomography. J Vasc Surg 2001; 33 (1) 42-50
• 33 Pages S, Favre JP, Cerisier A, Pyneeandee S, Boissier C, Veyret C. Comparison of color duplex ultrasound and computed tomography scan for surveillance after aortic endografting. Ann Vasc Surg 2001; 15 (2) 155-162
• 34 Parent FN, Meier GH, Godziachvili V , et al. The incidence and natural history of type I and II endoleak: a 5-year follow-up assessment with color duplex ultrasound scan. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35 (3) 474-481
• 35 McLafferty RB, McCrary BS, Mattos MA , et al. The use of color-flow duplex scan for the detection of endoleaks. J Vasc Surg 2002; 36 (1) 100-104
• 36 Giannoni MF, Palombo G, Sbarigia E, Speziale F, Zaccaria A, Fiorani P. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for aortic stent-graft surveillance. J Endovasc Ther 2003; 10 (2) 208-217
• 37 Bendick PJ, Bove PG, Long GW, Zelenock GB, Brown OW, Shanley CJ. Efficacy of ultrasound scan contrast agents in the noninvasive follow-up of aortic stent grafts. J Vasc Surg 2003; 37 (2) 381-385
• 38 Henao EA, Hodge MD, Felkai DD , et al. Contrast-enhanced Duplex surveillance after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: improved efficacy using a continuous infusion technique. J Vasc Surg 2006; 43 (2) 259-264 , discussion 264
• 39 Collins JT, Boros MJ, Combs K. Ultrasound surveillance of endovascular aneurysm repair: a safe modality versus computed tomography. Ann Vasc Surg 2007; 21 (6) 671-675
• 40 Tomlinson J, McNamara J, Matloubieh J , et al. Intermediate follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair: can we forgo CT scanning in certain patients?. Ann Vasc Surg 2007; 21 (6) 663-670
• 41 Chaer RA, Gushchin A, Rhee R , et al. Duplex ultrasound as the sole long-term surveillance method post-endovascular aneurysm repair: a safe alternative for stable aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2009; 49 (4) 845-849 , discussion 849–850
• 42 Iezzi R, Basilico R, Giancristofaro D, Pascali D, Cotroneo AR, Storto ML. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus color duplex ultrasound imaging in the follow-up of patients after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2009; 49 (3) 552-560
• 43 Ten Bosch JA, Rouwet EV, Peters CTH , et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomographic angiography for surveillance of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21 (5) 638-643
• 44 Cantisani V, Ricci P, Grazhdani H , et al. Prospective comparative analysis of colour-Doppler ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance in detecting endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 41 (2) 186-192
• 45 Perini P, Sediri I, Midulla M , et al. Single-centre prospective comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and computed tomography angiography after EVAR. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 42 (6) 797-802
• 46 Gürtler VM, Sommer WH, Meimarakis G , et al. A comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging and multislice computed tomography in detecting and classifying endoleaks in the follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2013; 58 (2) 340-345
• 47 Millen A, Canavati R, Harrison G , et al. Defining a role for contrast-enhanced ultrasound in endovascular aneurysm repair surveillance. J Vasc Surg 2013; 58 (1) 18-23
• 48 Geller SC. Society of Interventional Radiology Device Forum. Imaging guidelines for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with endovascular stent grafts. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14 (9 Pt 2, Suppl) S263-S264
• 49 Kranokpiraksa P, Kaufman JA. Follow-up of endovascular aneurysm repair: plain radiography, ultrasound, CT/CT angiography, MR imaging/MR angiography, or what?. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19 (6, Suppl) S27-S36
• 50 Veith FJ, Baum RA, Ohki T , et al. Nature and significance of endoleaks and endotension: summary of opinions expressed at an international conference. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35 (5) 1029-1035
• 51 Buth J, Harris PL, van Marrewijk C. Causes and outcomes of open conversion and aneurysm rupture after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: can type II endoleaks be dangerous?. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 194 (1, Suppl) S98-S102
• 52 Balm R, Kaatee R, Blankensteijn JD, Mali WP, Eikelboom BC. CT-angiography of abdominal aortic aneurysms after transfemoral endovascular aneurysm management. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996; 12 (2) 182-188
• 53 Wever JJ, Blankensteijn JD, van Rijn JC, Broeders IA, Eikelboom BC, Mali WP. Inter- and intraobserver variability of CT measurements obtained after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175 (5) 1279-1282
• 54 Wolf YG, Tillich M, Lee WA, Fogarty TJ, Zarins CK, Rubin GD. Changes in aneurysm volume after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2002; 36 (2) 305-309
• 55 Mehta M, Veith FJ, Ohki T, Lipsitz EC, Cayne NS, Darling III RC. Significance of endotension, endoleak, and aneurysm pulsatility after endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg 2003; 37 (4) 842-846
• 56 Conner III MS, Sternbergh III WC, Carter G, Tonnessen BH, Yoselevitz M, Money SR. Secondary procedures after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2002; 36 (5) 992-996
• 57 Zarins CK, Bloch DA, Crabtree T, Matsumoto AH, White RA, Fogarty TJ. Stent graft migration after endovascular aneurysm repair: importance of proximal fixation. J Vasc Surg 2003; 38 (6) 1264-1272 , discussion 1272
• 58 Ebaugh JL, Eskandari MK, Finkelstein A , et al. Caudal migration of endoprostheses after treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Surg Res 2002; 107 (1) 14-17
• 59 Fransen GA, Desgranges P, Laheij RJ, Harris PL, Becquemin JP, Collaborators EUROSTAR. EUROSTAR Collaborators. Frequency, predictive factors, and consequences of stent-graft kink following endovascular AAA repair. J Endovasc Ther 2003; 10 (5) 913-918
• 60 McWilliams RG, Martin J, White D , et al. Detection of endoleak with enhanced ultrasound imaging: comparison with biphasic computed tomography. J Endovasc Ther 2002; 9 (2) 170-179
• 61 Raman KG, Missig-Carroll N, Richardson T, Muluk SC, Makaroun MS. Color-flow duplex ultrasound scan versus computed tomographic scan in the surveillance of endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2003; 38 (4) 645-651
• 62 Elkouri S, Panneton JM, Andrews JC , et al. Computed tomography and ultrasound in follow-up of patients after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg 2004; 18 (3) 271-279
• 63 Napoli V, Bargellini I, Sardella SG , et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: contrast-enhanced US for missed endoleaks after endoluminal repair. Radiology 2004; 233 (1) 217-225
• 64 AbuRahma AF, Welch CA, Mullins BB, Dyer B. Computed tomography versus color duplex ultrasound for surveillance of abdominal aortic stent-grafts. J Endovasc Ther 2005; 12 (5) 568-573
• 65 Dill-Macky MJ, Wilson SR, Sternbach Y, Kachura J, Lindsay T. Detecting endoleaks in aortic endografts using contrast-enhanced sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188 (3) W262-W268
• 66 Sandford RM, Bown MJ, Fishwick G , et al. Duplex ultrasound scanning is reliable in the detection of endoleak following endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006; 32 (5) 537-541
• 67 Schmieder GC, Stout CL, Stokes GK, Parent FN, Panneton JM. Endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair: duplex ultrasound imaging is better than computed tomography at determining the need for intervention. J Vasc Surg 2009; 50 (5) 1012-1017 , discussion 1017–1018
• 68 Manning BJ, O'Neill SM, Haider SN, Colgan MP, Madhavan P, Moore DJ. Duplex ultrasound in aneurysm surveillance following endovascular aneurysm repair: a comparison with computed tomography aortography. J Vasc Surg 2009; 49 (1) 60-65
• 69 Bargellini I, Cioni R, Napoli V , et al. Ultrasonographic surveillance with selective CTA after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Endovasc Ther 2009; 16 (1) 93-104
• 70 Nagre SB, Taylor SM, Passman MA , et al. Evaluating outcomes of endoleak discrepancies between computed tomography scan and ultrasound imaging after endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg 2011; 25 (1) 94-100
• 71 Harrison GJ, Oshin OA, Vallabhaneni SR, Brennan JA, Fisher RK, McWilliams RG. Surveillance after EVAR based on duplex ultrasound and abdominal radiography. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 42 (2) 187-192
• 72 Rozenblit A, Marin ML, Veith FJ, Cynamon J, Wahl SI, Bakal CW. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of postoperative follow-up with helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165 (6) 1473-1479
• 73 Armerding MD, Rubin GD, Beaulieu CF , et al. Aortic aneurysmal disease: assessment of stent-graft treatment-CT versus conventional angiography. Radiology 2000; 215 (1) 138-146
• 74 Stavropoulos SW, Clark TW, Carpenter JP , et al. Use of CT angiography to classify endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16 (5) 663-667
• 75 Kirby JM, Jhaveri KS, Kachura JR. Computed tomography angiography in abdominal aortic endoleaks: what is the optimal protocol?. Can Assoc Radiol J 2007; 58 (5) 264-271
• 76 Sawhney R, Kerlan RK, Wall SD , et al. Analysis of initial CT findings after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Radiology 2001; 220 (1) 157-160
• 77 Golzarian J, Dussaussois L, Abada HT , et al. Helical CT of aorta after endoluminal stent-graft therapy: value of biphasic acquisition. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171 (2) 329-331
• 78 Iezzi R, Cotroneo AR, Filippone A , et al. Multidetector CT in abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with endovascular repair: are unenhanced and delayed phase enhanced images effective for endoleak detection?. Radiology 2006; 241 (3) 915-921
• 79 Brenner DJ, Elliston CD. Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening. Radiology 2004; 232 (3) 735-738
• 80 de Jong PA, Mayo JR, Golmohammadi K , et al. Estimation of cancer mortality associated with repetitive computed tomography scanning. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 173 (2) 199-203
• 81 Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 2007; 298 (3) 317-323
• 82 Wilmink AB, Forshaw M, Quick CR, Hubbard CS, Day NE. Accuracy of serial screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms by ultrasound. J Med Screen 2002; 9 (3) 125-127
• 83 Sprouse II LR, Meier III GH, Parent FN, DeMasi RJ, Glickman MH, Barber GA. Is ultrasound more accurate than axial computed tomography for determination of maximal abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter?. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004; 28 (1) 28-35
• 84 Ashoke R, Brown LC, Rodway A , et al. Color duplex ultrasonography is insensitive for the detection of endoleak after aortic endografting: a systematic review. J Endovasc Ther 2005; 12 (3) 297-305
• 85 Weigel S, Tombach B, Maintz D , et al. Thoracic aortic stent graft: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and CT angiography in the follow-up: initial results. Eur Radiol 2003; 13 (7) 1628-1634
• 86 Beeman BR, Murtha K, Doerr K, McAfee-Bennett S, Dougherty MJ, Calligaro KD. Duplex ultrasound factors predicting persistent type II endoleak and increasing AAA sac diameter after EVAR. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52 (5) 1147-1152
• 87 Mirza TA, Karthikesalingam A, Jackson D , et al. Duplex ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for the detection of endoleak after EVAR: systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010; 39 (4) 418-428
• 88 Go MR, Barbato JE, Rhee RY, Makaroun MS. What is the clinical utility of a 6-month computed tomography in the follow-up of endovascular aneurysm repair patients?. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47 (6) 1181-1186 , discussion 1186–1187
• 89 Sternbergh III WC, Greenberg RK, Chuter TA, Tonnessen BH. Zenith Investigators. Redefining postoperative surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair: recommendations based on 5-year follow-up in the US Zenith multicenter trial. J Vasc Surg 2008; 48 (2) 278-284 , discussion 284–285
• 90 Ohki T, Ouriel K, Silveira PG , et al. Initial results of wireless pressure sensing for endovascular aneurysm repair: the APEX Trial—Acute Pressure Measurement to Confirm Aneurysm Sac EXclusion. J Vasc Surg 2007; 45 (2) 236-242